Skip to content

OverclockersHQ.com


Increase font size  Decrease font size  Default font size 


In-Win 'NA 3.5 HDD Enclosure Review
In-Win 'NA 3.5 HDD Enclosure Review - Testing
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Written by PR0F GIGGLES   
Article Index
In-Win 'NA 3.5 HDD Enclosure Review
Specifications and Features
Testing
Conclusion
All Pages
Testing Setup:

CPU: Q6600
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3
Memory: 2 x 2GB Kingston
OS: Windows XP Home SP3
Video Card: ATI Radeon EAH 4550

Power Supply: 550 W PSU
Case: NZXT Tempest

Testing:

To Test the In-Win ‘NA I will be using our standard tests. I will be using HD Tune to do a benchmark of its USB and e SATA capabilities, and then I will be timing the upload speeds of a 10MB, 100MB, and a 500MB file. For this test I will be putting it against my CoolMax Leather Enclosure. Let’s begin.

HD Tune (USB)

Enclosure

In-Win ‘NA

CoolMax Leather

Ave MB/sec

33.3

32.7

Time

15.9 ms

15.3 ms

Burst Rate

25.1 MB/sec

27.8 MB/sec

CPU Usage

4.3%

3.6%

HD Tune (e SATA)

Enclosure

In-Win ‘NA

CoolMax Leather

Ave MB/sec

102.5

97.8

Time

15.3 ms

15.3 ms

Burst Rate

200 MB/sec

196.3 MB/sec

CPU Usage

1.6%

2.0

 Transfer Times (USB)

Enclosure

In-Win ‘NA

CoolMax Leather

10 MB

1

1

100 MB

4

5

500 MB

17

19

  Times (e SATA)

Enclosure

In-Win ‘NA

CoolMax Leather

10 MB

0.5

0.5

100 MB

1

1

500 MB

5

8

So from this we can see that the In-Win ‘NA is a really good enclosure. Using its e SATA function it outperformed the CoolMax enclosure which was our past burst rate leader but the In-Win ‘NA out performed it by delivering an even higher burst rate of 200MB/sec.

Now let’s get to my final thoughts:



Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Browse this website in: