Skip to content

OverclockersHQ.com


Increase font size  Decrease font size  Default font size 
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AM3 Motherboard Review
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AM3 Motherboard Review - Testing
User Rating: / 8
PoorBest 
Written by Munk   
Article Index
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AM3 Motherboard Review
Testing
All Pages

Testing Setup:

Comparison Systems:

 

Apophysis:

Apophysis is a program used to generate fractal images, this is a great test of a CPU's ability to render complex visual and numeral algorithms. We will run this benchmark with the following settings:

  • Resolution: 2750x2048
  • Quality: 500
  • Limit Memory use: 512MB


Time to Render:

Asrock (Intel) StockAsrock (Intel) Overclocked
 Asus (Intel) Stock Asus (Intel) OverclockedAsus (AMD) Stock 
Asus (AMD) Overclocked 
 6M 23.8 Sec
 3M 06.25 Sec
 6M 4 Sec
 2M 1 Sec
 6m 28Sec
6M 40 Sec

POV Ray 3.7:

POV Ray uses ray tracing in order to benchmark CPU performance. The latest versions support SMP (Symetric MultiProcessing) enabling the workload to be spread across the cores for a quicker completion. Which fully utilizes the whole CPU and motherboard which gives you a well rounded number using the full potential of the CPU for benchmarking. The results will be in Pixels per second.

Asrock (Intel) StockAsrock (Intel) Overclocked
 Asus (Intel) Stock Asus (Intel) OverclockedAsus (AMD) Stock
Asus (AMD) Overclocked
2401.202844.26
 2249.24 2873.94 36313847

 

Sisoft Sandra:

Sisoft Sandra gives you complete in depth analysis of your pc and everyone of its component. In my opinion this is the go to source for complete top to bottom testing of your PC and its abilities.

 

Processor Arithmetic:


Asrock (Intel)Dhrystone Gips
Whetston gflops
 Stock54.1
35.15
 Overclocked64.4
41.77
Asus (Intel)Dhrystone Gips
Whetston gflops
 Stock51
33
 Overclocked66.8
42.1
Asus (AMD)Dhrystone Gips
Whetston gflops
 Stock47.63
52.33
 Overclocked55.86
45.56

 

Multi-Core Efficiency:

 


Asrock (Intel Bandwidth GBs
Latency ns
 Stock30.75
14
 Overclocked33
12
Asus (Intel)  
Bandwidth GBs
Latency ns
 Stock23.6
15
 Overclocked33.8
12
Asus (Intel)  
Bandwidth GBs
Latency ns
 Stock23.6
15
 Overclocked33.8
12
Asus (AMD)Bandwidth GBs
Latency ns
 Stock5
72
 Overclocked5
72

 

Memory Bandwidth:

 


Asrock (Intel)Integer GBs
Float GBs
 Stock14.5
14.48
 Overclocked13.86
13.74
    Asus  (Intel)
Integer GBs
Float GBs
 Stock14.114
 Overclocked10.1
10
    Asus  (AMD) Integer GBs
Float GBs
 Stock1010
 Overclocked1010

 

Memory Latency:


Asrock  (Intel)ns
 Stock89
 Overclocked95
     Asus (Intel)ns
    Stock88
    Overclocked95
      Asus (AMD)ns
    Stock70
    Overclocked69

Cache and Memory;


Asrock (Intel)Bandwidth GBs
 Stock45.28
 Overclocked46
   Asus (Intel)Bandwidth GBs
    Stock37.4
    Overclocked40.78
   Asus (AMD)
Bandwidth GBs
    Stock48.52
    Overclocked49.84

File System:


Asrock  (Intel)Drive Index MBs
Random Access Time ms
 Stock100
7
 Overclocked95.13
6.7
   Asus  (Intel)Drive Index MBs
Random Access Time ms
 Stock94.2
4.8
 Overclocked92.6
7
    Asus  (AMD)Drive Index MBs
Random Access Time ms
 Stock111
2
 Overclocked108.67
7.18

 

Physical Disks:


Asrock (Intel)Index MBs
Random ms
 Stock85.53
12.65
 Overclocked84.4
13.16
   Asus (Intel)Index MBs
Random ms
 Stock85
12.76
 Overclocked84.6
13.4
    Asus (AMD)Index MBs
Random ms
 Stock82.82
15.32
 Overclocked82.38
15.1

Power Management Efficiency:


Asrock (Intel)Gips
 Stock15.25
 Overclocked12.8
   Asus  (Intel)Gips
 Stock14.23
 Overclocked12.8
   Asus  (AMD)Gips
 Stock12.8
 Overclocked10.75

So essentially we can see the two Motherboards didn’t fluctuate much from each other. The Asus seemed to Render the POV Bench a little better at OC settings than the Asrock but the bulk of the system tests through Sisoft Sandra are pretty neck and neck. Let’s take a look at some Photoshop Benches and some HD Rendering.

Driver Heaven's Photoshop Benchmark:


This test is about as real world a benchmark as you can get. If you are a photoshop user then you already know that having a pc that cannot handle photoshop can be a painful and aggravating event. This benchmark goes through a number of the effects that you can use in photoshop and times how long it take to complete these tasks. Let’s see how the two board stack up:

 

 

 TestAsrock Stock  (Intel)Asrock OC  (Intel) Asus Stock (Intel)Asus OC  (Intel) Asus Stock (AMD) Asus OC  (AMD)
 Texturizer 1.41.4
 1.41.3
 2.2 2.2
 CMY Colour Converter 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.2 1 1.3
 RGB Colour Converter
 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.9
 Ink Outlines
 18.6 16.7 19.8 15.6 18 17.8
 Dust and Scratches
 1.8 1.5 2 1.6 1.4 1.5
 Water Color
 18.7 15.7 20 18 18.1 18.1
 Stained Glass
 8.5 7.4 9.1 7 11.6 11.4
 Lighting Effect
 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.3
 Mosaic Tiles
 9.2 7.8 9.7 7.6 13.9 13.8
 Extrude 81.3 69.5 86.6 68.3 83.9 93
 Smart Blur
 41.8 35.7 44.4 36.1 44.7 44.4
 Under Painting
 16.7 14 17.9 15 20.3 20.3
 Palette Knife
 14.4 12.1 15.4 12.2 18 18
 Sponge 26 22 27.9 21.8 23.7 23.7

 

x264 - HD Benchmark (TecArp):

Our affiliates over at Techarp came up with a great way to benchmark HD rendering this handy little tool tells you exactly how much time it takes to render an HD file. Here are the results:

 

Asrock (Intel) Stock:

 encoded 1442 frames, 62.36 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 62.74 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 62.15 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 61.90 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.35 fps, 3971.06 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.31 fps, 3971.90 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.34 fps, 3971.76 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.33 fps, 3970.75 kb/s

Asrock (Intel) OC:

encoded 1442 frames, 52.95 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 45.16 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 55.44 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 57.40 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 12.66 fps, 3971.98 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 15.30 fps, 3970.73 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 12.60 fps, 3970.45 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 15.19 fps, 3970.98 kb/s

Asus (Intel) OC:
encoded 1442 frames, 66.66 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 67.35 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 67.04 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 67.04 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 19.29 fps, 3971.76 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 19.40 fps, 3971.74 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 19.35 fps, 3970.34 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 19.35 fps, 3971.61 kb/s


Asus
(Intel) Stock:

encoded 1442 frames, 57.84 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 58.03 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 58.47 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 57.85 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 16.12 fps, 3971.73 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 16.17 fps, 3971.98 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 16.17 fps, 3971.91 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 16.20 fps, 3970.62 kb/s

 

Asus (AMD OC:
encoded 1442 frames, 77.50 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 77.08 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 78.01 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 77.76 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 24.18 fps, 3971.59 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 24.20 fps, 3971.55 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 24.19 fps, 3971.06 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 24.18 fps, 3970.67 kb/s


Asus
(AMD) Stock:

encoded 1442 frames, 77.53 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 77.34 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 77.96 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 78.08 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 24.16 fps, 3971.69 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 24.19 fps, 3971.91 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 24.26 fps, 3971.58 kb/s

We can see that the AMD ASUS combo beast the competitions in FPS by a long shot so there is excellent rendering capabilities for HD video with the added cores and 785G chipset working together.

 

Super Pi:

So just for the heck of it, maybe for nostalgia sake, I decided to do a quick 1MB file run on Super Pi just to see how well the Motherboards fair:

 

Asrock (Intel) Stock:

 11.73 seconds

Asrock (Intel) Overclocked:

6.7 seconds

Asus (Intel) Stock:

 12.32

Asus (Intel) Overclocked:

10.14

Asus (AMD) Stock:

 18.6

Asus (AMD) Overclocked:

17.6

Gamin, Futuremark, And Cinebench Performance:

 

Conclusion:

So overall performance is decent, the key features of the Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AM3 Motherboard are the power system which I mentioned in the introduction to this review. The board’s benchmark results are great numbers even though they fell short from the Intel boards in a few instances. The quality of the build of this board makes it a great choice for mid level crossfire X setups. I would like to see USB 3.0 on this board but this is a fantastic board right out of the box for anyone wanting a performance Media PC with all the bells and whistles needed for quality HD performance. The robust 1800+ memory and the ability to use a Phenom ii 965 BE CPU makes this board a likely candidate for rendering audio and video as well as a perfect choice right out of the box for graphic designers.

Although it is great for work station applications, its ability to game is not short sighted; dual card support and great tweaking software make it a great board to start out with for entry level Overclockers. The bios is robust and the included software is very intuitive.

I was extremely impressed with the ability to pop in 16GB’s of DDR3 and the onboard GPU being capable of full 1080P through HDMI. I can go on and on about the features of this board but when it comes down to it, for entry level users it works great out of the box, for intermediate tweakers it works great out of the box, and for advanced enthusiasts it works great out of the box so what else is there to say? If you are looking for a robust AM3 rig and don’t need a graphics card this is for you, even if you need a graphics card it is still a great choice.

The final thing I will say in promotion of this motherboard is that it is passively cooled; north bridge coolers with fans are almost always the first things to die in a rig and they are always extremely annoying. This chipset stays nice and cool even under overclocked testing; it is ideal for HTPC applications and they are perfect for maintaining a quiet office as well.

Pros:
  • Price
  • Robust Bios
  • Great Tweaking Software
  • Rock Solid Power Distribution
  • Passive Cooling
  • Overclocked Performance
  • Great Heatsink Design
  • Q Connectoris a Life Saver

Cons:

  • No USB 3.0
  • Strange Placement for CPU fan 
  • IDE Placement if Crossfire is Used

 





Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Browse this website in:

Store and Forum Login







blog advertising is good for you